Sign up for our mailing list:

Racism/Sexism/Stereotypes

August 16th, 2007

Determination 151: Mari Newman v. Minnesota Daily

In May 2007, local artist Mari Newman filed a complaint about an article in the Minnesota Daily, the student newspaper of the University of Minnesota. A review of a play called “The Madwoman of Chaillot” had opened by referencing the disabled artist as a local “crazy woman.”

More »

April 19th, 1999

Determination 122: Nancy Barsness v. Morris Sun/Tribune

Participants included the complainant, Nancy Barsness and editor/general manager of the Morris Sun/Tribune, Jim Morrison.

More »

April 21st, 1994

Determination 100: Worthington Residents v. Worthington Daily Globe

This grievance concerned two issues. First, that the Globe’s story violated reasonable journalistic standards by portraying anonymous comments from fewer than 250 persons as a statistically valid survey (the paper’s circulation is 14,000). Second, that the Globe unfairly denied letter writers an opportunity to criticize the newspaper.

August 29th, 1990

Determination 85: WAMM & Women/Work/Welfare v. KARE-TV

In February 1990, KARE-TV, Channel 11 ran a three-part series depicting abuses in the state welfare system by welfare recipients. At the time, certain remedial legislation was being proposed in the legislature. The general thrust of the series was that large sums of welfare funds were being lost because of fraudulent claims by recipients and that the public authorities were devoting insufficient resources and personnel to investigate the fraud. Women Against Military Madness (WAMM) filed a complaint with the Council, claiming that the program contained factual inaccuracies. As the basis for its complaint, WAMM relied on a two-page fact sheet prepared by the Department of Human Services entitled “Corrections to False or Misleading Statements in KARE 11 Welfare Fraud Series.”A Question of Standing: On occasion, the Council may sponsor a forum to discuss a media topic; in this setting, the question of standing does not arise. When, however, the Council hears a particular charge against a particular newspaper or television station, the Council generally requires that the complaining party have standing, i.e., some immediate, direct personal interest which is adversely affected by the news story. The requirement of standing gives some assurance that both sides of the dispute will be adequately presented and represented; that the issues will be well-defined; and that due process is accorded the party against whom the complaint is made.

More »

March 30th, 1990

Determination 81: The City Inc. v. Star Tribune

The City, Inc. is a social and educational community service organization working with troubled inner-city youth and their families, particularly in the African American and American Indian communities in Minneapolis. On October 7, 1989, the Star Tribune published an article titled “The City Inc. and The Way survive criticism.” The complaint is twofold:

                      That the article gives an inaccurate and racially insensitive portrayal of The City.

                      That a representative of the organization is misquoted as making a racist remark.

August 5th, 1988

Determination 75: United Black Front v. Star Tribune

Ron Edwards appeared for the grievant. Tim McGuire, managing editor, Peg Meier, reporter, and Lou Gelfand, reader representative, appeared for the Star Tribune. About 20 visitors attended the hearing. Those speaking on behalf of the complaint were Mahmoud El-Kati, Carol Ann White, Dr. James T. Shelton, Jusef Mgeni, and Nellie Stone Johnson.

More »

March 18th, 1988

Determination 71: Nancy Barsness v. Pope County Tribune

Grievant Nancy Barsness complains that the Pope County Tribune failed to give fair and adequate coverage of a sex discrimination claim against Watkins Aircraft Support Products, Inc. (Watkins or WASP), a light manufacturing firm located in Glenwood, Minnesota.

More »

March 29th, 1982

Determination 45: Proctor City Council v. Proctor Journal

The Proctor City Council complained that the weekly paper:

  1. Unfairly and incorrectly reported the city’s financial status with respect to tax increases, budgets, and other fiscal matters during 1981;
  2. Stated and implied that city council members were racists and bigots;
  3. Falsely accused the city council of law violations;
  4. Quoted councilor Jake Benson as making statements at council meetings that were, in fact, not made (Benson is also editor and publisher of the Proctor Journal);
  5. Exceeded the bounds of journalistic propriety in its comments about the personal integrity of individual council members.

More »

July 22nd, 1979

Determination 39: Ben Sternberg v. Minneapolis Tribune

Ben Sternberg, professional boxing promoter, complained that the newspaper, through the use of inflammatory graphics and writing and the manipulation of facts, falsely implied in an article that he was a racist and somewhat of a Mafia figure.

More »

March 26th, 1979

Determination 35: Burtrand/Church of Wicca v. Minneapolis Star

A man named Burtrand, high priest of the Church of Wicca (a religion known also as witchcraft), complained that the newspaper was unfair when it associated witchcraft with satanic activities in two articles published on its religion page, headlined “Occult.” Burtrand claimed that the layout, taken as a whole - including artwork, photographs and articles - perpetuated negative and erroneous stereotypes about the occult.

More »