Sign up for our mailing list:

Advertising Policy

April 19th, 2007

Determination 149: Citizens for Truth in Government v. Bemidji Pioneer

News Council denies complaint that Bemidji Pioneer was unfair in running news story about a full-page ad the same day it appeared, but upholds complaint that the story on Red Lake Reservation was unfair to those who ran the ad.

More »

March 18th, 1988

Determination 72: Edward Tekautz v. Chisholm Free Press-Tribune

Veda Ponikvar, publisher of the Chisholm Free Press-Tribune Press, did not attend but responded to complainant and to the Council in writing and met with the Council’s executive director in Chisholm on March 2, 1988. Complainant Edward Tekautz attended the hearing.

More »

October 11th, 1985

Determination 61: DFL House Campaign Committee v. Waconia Patriot, Carver County News, Norwood Times

The grievance arises out of the news coverage afforded by the three newspapers of the 1984 election campaign for state representative of District 35B, between K. J. McDonald (I-R), the incumbent, and Jim Hoese (DFL), the challenger. McDonald won the strenuous campaign. The Hoese DFL House Campaign Committee raises the following issues …

More »

June 14th, 1985

Determination 60: Candidate John Meiners v. Delano Eagle

Complainant John Meiners claims the Delano Eagle should apologize for choosing to run an advertisement in which false information was written about him. He claims the news source should have known the facts or at least contacted him about the ad. 

April 12th, 1985

Determination 58: Mary Jane Rachner v. St. Paul Pioneer Press

Grievant claims the newspaper improperly refused to accept two of her campaign advertisements.

More »

February 1st, 1983

Determination 51: Bartlett for Sheriff Campaign v. Austin Daily Herald

Jim Bartlett, a deputy sheriff of Mower County, ran for the office of county sheriff against the incumbent, and following a heated election campaign, his campaign committee filed a multiple complaint against the paper, implying that it had contributed to Bartlett’s defeat in the general election. The committee complained that the paper:

 

  1. Failed to adequately cover several incidents concerning incumbent Sheriff Wayne Goodnature’s record in office which reflected negatively on the incumbent’s competence;
  2. Unfairly demanded changes in several of the committee’s political advertisements and refused to publish one ad;
  3. Unfairly denied Bartlett supporters access to the newspaper’s letters-to-the-editor column; and
  4. Failed to give proper coverage to the election results.

More »

June 1st, 1979

Determination 38: Regina’s Candies v. Minneapolis Tribune

Regina’s Fine Candies, St. Paul, complained that a taste survey of chocolates was unscientific and unfair to Regina’s and to the U.S. chocolate industry.

More »

October 15th, 1976

Determination 19: Citizens for Community Action v. Minneapolis Star & Minneapolis Tribune

Citizens for Community Action (CCA), an anti-life group, complained that the two papers used arbitrary standards when they refused to print as submitted to them a paid advertisement that opposed construction of an abortion clinic in a St. Paul neighborhood. The ad listed the clinic’s officers and sponsors, their home addresses and phone numbers, but the papers insisted that only business addresses be used for the clinic’s officers.

More »

April 4th, 1973

Determination 6: Candidate Larry Lahauvietz v. Pipestone County Star

Larry Blahauvietz, a candidate for Pipestone City Council, complained that the paper was unfair and discriminatory when he was refused paid political advertising space in the issue running the day before the elections. A rival candidate’s ad appeared in the paper on that day.

More »

July 19th, 1972

Determination 3: Mary Jane Rachner v. Union Advocate

Complaint: Mary Jane Rachner, a candidate in the 1972 elections for St. Paul School Board, complained that the newspaper was unfair and discriminatory when it refused to accept her paid political advertisement. The Union Advocate is a weekly serving primarily organized labor in the greater St. Paul area. Rachner was not a labor-endorsed candidate and did not claim to be in her ad.

More »