Sign up for our mailing list:

1976

November 18th, 1976

Determination 23: Staff of Gerry Sikorski, Vance Opperman & William McDonough v. Stillwater Eve. Gazette

Vance Opperman and William McDonough, staff members for Gerald Sikorski’s 1976 state senate campaign, complained that the publisher manipulated the newspaper’s letters-to-the-editor policy in order to oppose Sikorski’s candidacy and support his opponent.

More »

October 15th, 1976

Determination 19: Citizens for Community Action v. Minneapolis Star & Minneapolis Tribune

Citizens for Community Action (CCA), an anti-life group, complained that the two papers used arbitrary standards when they refused to print as submitted to them a paid advertisement that opposed construction of an abortion clinic in a St. Paul neighborhood. The ad listed the clinic’s officers and sponsors, their home addresses and phone numbers, but the papers insisted that only business addresses be used for the clinic’s officers.

More »

August 15th, 1976

Determination 21: Rep. Ray Kempe v. Apple Valley Free Press

Ray Kempe, state representative from District 53A running for re-election, complained that an editorial was deliberately designed to malign him and misrepresent his comments made in a recent interview with the writer.

More »

August 10th, 1976

Determination 20: Michael McKee v. St. Paul Pioneer Press

Michael McKee of St. Paul complained that the paper arbitrarily denied him fair access to its letters-to-the-editor column. He also charged the paper with refusal to print divergent viewpoints on controversial subjects or letters not in sympathy with the editor’s viewpoint.

More »

March 12th, 1976

Determination 22: Doug Elwood v. St. Paul Dispatch

Doug Elwood, et al., acting on behalf of 14 area gay rights groups, complained that an entertainment column contained inaccuracies and descriptive words offensive to local gay rights groups. Even though a second column by the same writer admitted and corrected the errors, Elwood complained that it didn’t sufficiently remedy the original inaccuracies and that defamatory language was used in both columns.

More »