Sign up for our mailing list:

Archive for 1992

December 10th, 1992

Determination 96: Pam Coyle v. Austin Daily Herald

During this hearing, Coyle brought up complaints on two issues. First, that an item under the headline “Police Report” inaccurately stated that her job status had been discussed at a city/county Law Enforcement Commission meeting, when it had not. Second, that the paper treated her unfairly by running 10 items in its editorial-page feature “Anonymous Comments,” criticizing her and calling for her dismissal from her job.

December 10th, 1992

Determination 95: Candidate Sally Evert v. Stillwater Gazette

Former Washington County commissioner Sally Evert complained that the Gazette was unfair to her re-election campaign by running a front-page article under a four-column headline promoting her opponent’s candidacy, with a byline of a writer who was a campaign worker for him, but who was not so identified. It also ran her opponent’s thank-you to his supporters as a guest column, with his picture, but ran her thank-you as a letter to the editor with no picture. FInally, it ran a critical letter to the editor without saying that the writer was her opponent’s campaign manager.

  

More »

October 8th, 1992

Determination 94: Dr. Paul Matson v. Mankato Free Press

A Mankato orthopedist complained that the newspaper ran a story, with a display headline and photograph on the front page of the local section, in which a woman who had picketed his office called him a liar, but in which he did not receive an opportunity to reply. He said the Free Press’s display made it a big story in a small town and did not adhere to the least standard of ethical fair play: “It can take years to build up a reputation that can be destroyed (by the press) in seconds.”

More »

April 14th, 1992

Determination 93: Professor William Lass v. Star Tribune

A Mankato State University professor complains that the Star Tribune failed to contact him for a story on problems in the Indian Studies program that quoted a student accusing him of arbitrarily changing her grade.

January 9th, 1992

Determination 92: Metropolitan Council v. WCCO-TV

The complainant claims the television station acted contrary to “accepted journalistic conventions” in ignoring an embargo placed on a news release by the complainant.

More »